System and method for qualitatively determining vehicle loading conditions

ABSTRACT

A control system ( 18 ) and method for an automotive vehicle ( 10 ) includes a controller ( 26 ) that determines whether or not a potential load change has occurred in a load change detector ( 59 ). A load change detector ( 59 ) may be coupled to various sensors to determine whether or not a change in load has occurred. If a change in load has occurred an adaptively determined roll condition parameter such as a roll acceleration coefficient, a roll rate parameter or a roll gradient may be reset. If a potential load change has not occurred, then a newly determined value for an adaptive roll condition may be included in a revised adaptive roll condition average. A safety device ( 44 ) may be controlled in response to the revised adaptive roll condition.

RELATED APPLICATION

The present application is a divisional of co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 10/972,973, filed on Oct. 25, 2004 herein incorporated by reference.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates generally to a control apparatus for controlling a system of an automotive vehicle in response to sensed dynamic behavior, and more specifically, to a method and apparatus for qualitatively determining a change in vehicle loading.

BACKGROUND

Recently, vehicle roll stability control (RSC) schemes, i.e., U.S. Pat. No. 6,324,446, have been proposed to address the issue of friction-induced rollovers. RSC system includes a variety of sensors sensing vehicle states and a controller that controls a distributed brake pressure to reduce a tire force so the net moment of the vehicle is counter to the roll direction.

During an event causing the vehicle to roll, the vehicle body is subject to a roll moment due to the coupling of the lateral tire force and the lateral acceleration applied to the center of gravity of vehicle body. This roll moment causes suspension height variation, which in turn results in a vehicle relative roll angle (also called chassis roll angle or suspension roll angle). The relative roll angle is an important variable that is used as an input to the activation criteria and to construct the feedback brake pressure command, since it captures the relative roll between the vehicle body and the axle. The sum of such a chassis roll angle and the roll angle between wheel axle and the road surface (called wheel departure angle) provides the roll angle between the vehicle body and the average road surface, which is one of the important variables feeding back to the roll stability control module.

The chassis roll angle can be calculated as in U.S. Pat. No. 6,556,908 using the lateral acceleration of the center of gravity of the vehicle body, the roll angular acceleration, and the roll angular velocity, together with vehicle-specific parameters such as the sprung mass, the vehicle body roll moment of inertia, the roll stiffness and damping ratio of the suspensions and the anti-roll-bars, and the distance between the center of gravity of the vehicle body and the floor of the vehicle body. The disclosure of U.S. Pat. No. 6,556,908 is hereby incorporated by reference.

One problem with using these parameters in the computation the afore-mentioned relative roll angle is that they may vary with the vehicle operating conditions. For example, a 150 pound roof loading for a typical SUV with a curb weight of 5000 pounds may cause more than 30% error in relative roll angle calculations if computed assuming no roof load. From the vehicle mass point of view, although a 150 pound roof loading accounts for only a 3% mass variation over the vehicle curb weight, it could account for a 30% error in the chassis roll computation, which is ten times larger. If the above parameters are fixed at certain nominal values in the RSC system, it is conceivable that optimal control performance may not be achieved under a different loading condition. For example, if the relative roll angle is computed with nominal vehicle loading condition assumptions, without considering roof loading, the relative roll angle may be under estimated for vehicles with roof loadings, which results in a reduced control. That is, the control system may not be as effective as desired. On the other hand, if the relative roll angle is computed with maximum roof loading, it may be over estimated for vehicles without roof loadings causing unintended control. That is, the control system may become too sensitive or intrusive. Therefore, in order to improve the overall performance of the RSC system, it may be desirable to estimate and update the vehicle parameters periodically or adaptively adjust in real time based on the detected vehicle loading.

Certain schemes for obtaining vehicle parameters have been disclosed. For example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,548,079, a method is disclosed for determining vehicle mass directly using engine output torque and vehicle acceleration. Similarly, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,490,063, push force is determined from the driveline torque and gear ratio to obtain vehicle mass. In U.S. Pat. No. 6,167,357, instead of calculating vehicle mass directly, a recursive least square (RLS) algorithm is proposed to estimate both vehicle mass and aerodynamic coefficient online. The latter method is considered to be more reliable since it recursively adjusts for estimation error of the previous estimates. Furthermore, the use of vehicle acceleration, which is usually very noisy, is avoided. Notice that the mass estimation schemes proposed in the above-cited patents may not accurately indicate changes to parameters that impact the roll dynamics of the vehicle. For example, a 150 pound roof loading on a 5000 pound SUV, i.e., 3% mass change, might be undetectable in the above schemes due to the potential error in the engine torque, which usually is much larger than 3%. Other error sources include the road grade, the tire rolling radius change due to tire pressure drop and due to the vehicle loading variations and the vehicle drag.

The above schemes focus mainly on large mass variations which may have significant influences on the vehicle longitudinal dynamics and vehicle fuel consumption. They do not differentiate whether the vehicle mass change is due to a floor loading or due to a roof loading. However, the roof loading causes much more significant roll motion parameter changes than the same amount of floor loading does. That is, there is a need to detect not only the amount of loading (maybe small), but also the location of the loading (the vertical and longitudinal distance of the loading with respect to the vehicle floor or the center of gravity of the vehicle body, for example).

That is, the prior art does not address vehicle inertia and mass properties with respect to the vehicle body roll and lateral dynamics. The estimation methodologies suggested in the literature consider the vehicle longitudinal dynamics and are not appropriate for an RSC system where the lateral and roll dynamics are more important than longitudinal dynamics.

Furthermore, the other parameters that effect vehicle body roll and lateral dynamics, such as the roll stiffness and damping in the suspension, the total center of gravity height of the vehicle body with respect to the vehicle floor and the roll moment of inertia, have not been estimated and/or considered in the prior art.

In the parent application, a method to estimate coefficients (i.e., roll gradient, roll acceleration coefficient, roll rate coefficient, roll moment of inertia, mass, CG height) related to vehicle loading conditions by analyzing data from the sensors on the vehicle was set forth. These estimates become more robust as the data is averaged over the “long term” or a large variety of the driving conditions; the more data that is averaged, the more robust the estimates can be. However, this averaging process needs to be reset in cases where there is an indication of potential load changes. For example, each time the vehicle stops for long period of time, there is the potential that the vehicle loading has changed. In reality the vehicle loading may not change, however, with no qualitative indication that the load did or did not change, the conservative approach is to always reset the averaging process. Such a algorithm of determining when a potential loading change occurs, used in determining if resetting the averaging process is necessary, is called qualitative load change determination. Therefore, there is a need for a technique to determine qualitatively when a load has potentially changed so that vehicle parameters may be refined and averaged quantitatively in response to the qualitatively changed load so as to improve the robustness of estimated parameters and to improve a vehicle control system relating to roll stability control functions.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The invention provides a qualitative determination as to whether the load may have changed. This may be used together with a quantitative characterization of the chassis roll that may be used in conjunction with the roll stability control system of the vehicle to determine accurate vehicle roll trending for vehicles with varying inertia parameters due to loading conditions, and adaptively adjust the computation of the chassis roll angle and/or adaptively adjust the activation criteria for the roll stability control function.

In one aspect of the invention, a method of controlling a vehicle comprises determining a potential load change, determining a revised adaptive roll condition parameter in response to the potential load change, and controlling the safety system in response to the revised adaptive roll condition parameter.

In a further aspect of the invention, a method of controlling a safety system for a vehicle includes generating a roll rate signal indicative of a roll rate of the vehicle, determining potential load change conditions, determining a revised added mass in response to the roll rate signal and the potential load change, and controlling the safety system in response to the revised added mass.

One advantage of the invention is that various entry conditions, i.e., when to update various vehicle parameters in response to the load and when to start the averaging process, may be determined. Such conditions may be implemented relatively easily on a vehicle using the output of existing sensors. Another advantage is that vehicle loading conditions can be detected and determined very accurately. Such loading conditions (for example, roof loadings) are usually a fraction of the total vehicle mass (for example, 3% to 6% of the vehicle curb weight). Such loading conditions are difficult to detect when using methods involving longitudinal vehicle dynamics because such conditions may be of little influence in the vehicle's longitudinal dynamics but may still cause large (for example, more than 30%) changes in the chassis roll angle.

Other advantages and features of the present invention will become apparent when viewed in light of the detailed description of the preferred embodiment when taken in conjunction with the attached drawings and appended claims.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic view of a vehicle with variable vectors and coordinate frames according to the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a stability system according to the present invention.

FIG. 3 is a front view of an automotive vehicle illustrating various angles according to the present invention.

FIG. 4 is a side view of an automotive vehicle illustrating various variables thereon.

FIG. 5 is a top view of an automotive vehicle having variables used in the following calculations thereon.

FIG. 6 is a block diagrammatic view of a controller according to a first embodiment of a least square method of the present invention.

FIG. 6A is a block diagrammatic view of a controller according to a second embodiment of a least square method of the present invention.

FIG. 7 is a flowchart of a method of operating the present invention.

FIG. 8 is a flow chart to qualitatively determine changes to vehicle loading.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In the following figures, the same reference numerals will be used to identify the same components. The present invention may be used in conjunction with a rollover control system for a vehicle. The present invention may also be used with a deployment device such as an airbag or active roll bar. The present invention will be discussed below in terms of preferred embodiments relating to an automotive vehicle moving in a three-dimensional road terrain. The present invention is described with respect to determining an added mass and height of the mass. As will be described below, the added mass and height may not be directly determined, rather by adaptively updating roll condition parameter such as a roll gradient value, roll acceleration coefficient roll moment of inertia and/or a roll rate coefficient, the effects of added mass and the height may be included in those values. Such values may also be referred to as an “adaptive” roll gradient, an “adaptive” roll acceleration coefficient, an “adaptive” roll moment of inertia and an “adaptive” roll rate coefficient. The various roll parameters may be referred to as adaptively determined, meaning that such values may change due to a changing mass or load over time. That is, such values are not fixed as has been done in previous systems. These roll condition parameters may be iteratively determined. That is, the values may be updated as the vehicle is running or driving. The values may then be averaged.

It should also be noted that while one of the roll gradient, roll acceleration coefficient and roll rate coefficient may be adaptively determined, the other two values may not be adaptive.

Referring to FIG. 1, an automotive vehicle 10 with a safety system of the present invention is illustrated with the various forces and moments thereon during a rollover condition. Vehicle 10 has front right (FR) and front left (FL) wheel/tires 12A and 12B and rear right (RR) wheel/tires 13A and rear left (RL) wheel/tires 13B, respectively. The vehicle 10 may also have a number of different types of front steering systems 14 a and rear steering systems 14 b, including having each of the front and rear wheels configured with a respective controllable actuator, the front and rear wheels having a conventional type system in which both of the front wheels are controlled together and both of the rear wheels are controlled together, a system having conventional front steering and independently controllable rear steering for each of the wheels, or vice versa. Generally, the vehicle has a weight represented as Mg at the center of gravity of the vehicle, where g=9.8 m/s² and M is the total mass of the vehicle.

As mentioned above, the system may also be used with safety systems including active/semi-active suspension systems, anti-roll bar, or airbags or other safety devices deployed or activated upon sensing predetermined dynamic conditions of the vehicle.

The sensing system 16 is coupled to a control system 18. The sensing system 16 may comprise many different sensors including the sensor set typically found in a roll stability control or a rollover control system (including lateral accelerometer, yaw rate sensor, steering angle sensor and wheel speed sensor which are equipped for a traditional yaw stability control system) together with a roll rate sensor and a longitudinal accelerometer. The various sensors will be further described below. The sensors may also be used by the control system in various determinations such as to determine a lifting event, determine a height and position of a mass, etc. The wheel speed sensors 20 are mounted at each corner of the vehicle and generate signals corresponding to the rotational speed of each wheel. The rest of the sensors of sensing system 16 may be mounted directly on the center of gravity of the vehicle body, along the directions x,y and z shown in FIG. 1. As those skilled in the art will recognize, the frame from b₁,b₂ and b₃ is called a body frame 22, whose origin is located at the center of gravity of the car body, with the b₁ corresponding to the x axis pointing forward, b₂ corresponding to the y axis pointing off the driving side (to the left), and the b₃ corresponding to the z axis pointing upward. The angular rates of the car body are denoted about their respective axes as ω_(x) for the roll rate, ω_(y) for the pitch rate and ω_(z) for the yaw rate. Calculations may take place in an inertial frame 24 that may be derived from the body frame 22 as described below.

The angular rate sensors and the accelerometers may be mounted on the vehicle car body along the body frame directions b₁,b₂ and b₃ which are the x-y-z axes of the sprung mass of the vehicle.

The longitudinal acceleration sensor is mounted on the car body located at the center of gravity, with its sensing direction along b₁ axis, whose output is denoted as a_(x). The lateral acceleration sensor is mounted on the car body located at the center of gravity, with its sensing direction along b₂ axis, whose output is denoted as a_(y).

The other frame used in the following discussion includes the road frame, as depicted in FIG. 1. The road frame system r₁r₂r₃ is fixed on the driven road surface, where the r₃ axis is along the average road normal direction computed from the normal directions of the four-tire/road contact patches.

In the following discussion, the Euler angles of the body frame b₁b₂b₃ with respect to the road frame r₁r₂r₃ are denoted as θ_(xbr) and θ_(ybr), which are also called the relative Euler angles (i.e., relative roll and relative pitch angles, respectively).

Referring now to FIG. 2, roll stability control system 18 is illustrated in further detail having a controller 26 used for receiving information from a number of sensors which may include a yaw rate sensor 28, a speed sensor 20, a lateral acceleration sensor 32, a vertical accelerometer sensor 33, a roll angular rate sensor 34, a steering wheel (hand wheel) angle sensor 35, a longitudinal acceleration sensor 36, a pitch rate sensor 37, steering angle (of the wheels or actuator) position sensor 38, suspension load sensor 39, a suspension position sensor 40, a door/tailgate sensor 41 a transmission controller 42, a accelerator/throttle signal generator 43A and a brake pedal/brake signal generator 43B. It should be noted that various combinations and sub-combinations of the sensors may be used.

Lateral acceleration, roll orientation and speed may be obtained using a global positioning system (GPS). Based upon inputs from the sensors, controller 26 may control a safety device 44. Depending on the desired sensitivity of the system and various other factors, not all the sensors 28-43B may be used in a commercial embodiment. Safety device 44 may control an airbag 45 or a steering actuator 46A-46D at one or more of the wheels 12A, 12B, 13A, 13B of the vehicle. Also, other vehicle components such as a suspension control 48 may be used to adjust the suspension to prevent rollover.

Roll angular rate sensor 34 and pitch rate sensor 37 may sense the roll condition or lifting of the vehicle based on sensing the height of one or more points on the vehicle relative to the road surface. Sensors that may be used to achieve this include but are not limited to a radar-based proximity sensor, a laser-based proximity sensor and a sonar-based proximity sensor. The roll rate sensor 34 may also use a combination of sensors such as proximity sensors to make a roll rate determination.

Roll rate sensor 34 and pitch rate sensor 37 may also sense the roll condition or lifting based on sensing the linear or rotational relative displacement or displacement velocity of one or more of the suspension chassis components. This may be in addition to or in combination with suspension position sensor 40. The suspension position sensor 40, roll rate sensor 34 and/or the pitch rate sensor 37 may include a linear height or travel sensor, a rotary height or travel sensor, a wheel speed sensor used to look for a change in velocity, a steering wheel position sensor, a steering wheel velocity sensor and a driver heading command input from an electronic component that may include steer by wire using a hand wheel or joy stick.

The roll condition or lifting may also be sensed by sensing directly or estimating the force or torque associated with the loading condition of one or more suspension or chassis components including a pressure transducer in an active air suspension, a shock absorber sensor such as a load sensor 39, a strain gauge, the steering system absolute or relative motor load, the steering system pressure of the hydraulic lines, a tire lateral force sensor or sensors, a longitudinal tire force sensor, a vertical tire force sensor or a tire sidewall torsion sensor. The yaw rate sensor 28, the roll rate sensor 34, the lateral acceleration sensor 32, and the longitudinal acceleration sensor 36 may be used together to determine that the wheel has lifted. Such sensors may be used to determine wheel lift or estimate normal loading associated with wheel lift.

The roll condition of the vehicle may also be established by one or more of the following translational or rotational positions, velocities or accelerations of the vehicle including a roll gyro, the roll rate sensor 34, the yaw rate sensor 28, the lateral acceleration sensor 32, the vertical acceleration sensor 33, a vehicle longitudinal acceleration sensor 36, lateral or vertical speed sensor including a wheel-based speed sensor 20, a radar-based speed sensor, a sonar-based speed sensor, a laser-based speed sensor or an optical-based speed sensor.

Controller 26 may include a signal multiplexer 50 that is used to receive the signals from the sensors 28-43B. The signal multiplexer 50 provides the signals to a wheel lift detector 52, a vehicle roll angle calculator 54, and to a roll stability control (RSC) feedback control command 56. Also, wheel lift detector 52 may be coupled to the vehicle roll angle calculator 54. The vehicle roll angle calculator 54 may also be coupled to the RSC feedback command 56. The RSC feedback command 56 may include a torque controller 57. Vehicle roll angle calculator 54 is described in U.S. Provisional Applications 60/400,376 and 60/400,172, and in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/459,697, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.

A loading detector 58 may also be included in controller 26. The loading detector 58 may be used to determine an additional mass of the vehicle and a distance of the mass as will be described below.

A potential load change detector 59 may also be included in controller 26. The potential load change detector 59 may qualitatively determine if there was a potential change in load for the vehicle. If the vehicle has stopped (as determined from speed sensor 20) and a door/tailgate sensor 41 indicates the door was opened, the load may have changed. Further, the longitudinal acceleration may be compared to the estimated driveshaft torque. The driveshaft torque may be estimated by the engine or transmission controller 42. Suspension height changes may also indicate that the load has changed. Such changes in height may be determined using the suspension position sensor 40. The load change may be directly observed at the load sensor 39, if the vehicle is so equipped. Transmission shifting changes depending on the load. Therefore, the transmission controller 42 may output a signal indicating a changed load. The throttle movement from the accelerator pedal or actual throttle itself may be determined at the throttle signal generator 43A. The brake signal generator 43B may generate a braking signal. By looking at changes in the trend (more or less force or shorter or longer duration), a load change may be determined.

The vehicle dynamic sensors 32-34 and 36-37 may be located at the center of gravity of the vehicle. Those skilled in the art will recognize that the sensor may also be located off the center of gravity and translated equivalently thereto.

Safety device 44 may control the position of the front right wheel actuator 46A, the front left wheel actuator 46B, the rear left wheel actuator 46C, and the right rear wheel actuator 46D. Although as described above, two or more of the actuators may be simultaneously controlled. For example, in a rack-and-pinion system, the two wheels coupled thereto are simultaneously controlled. Based on the inputs from sensors 28 through 43B, controller determines a roll condition and/or wheel lift and controls the steering position and/or braking of the wheels.

Safety device 44 may be coupled to a brake controller 60. Brake controller 60 controls the amount of brake torque at a front right brake 62 a, front left brake 62 b, rear left brake 62 c and a rear right brake 62 d. Other safety systems such as an antilock brake system 64, a yaw stability control system 66 and a traction control system 68 may also benefit from the knowledge of the roll gradient, roll rate parameter, roll acceleration coefficient, additional mass and position of the mass. This information may impact the control strategy such as modifying the brake force.

Speed sensor 20 may be one of a variety of speed sensors known to those skilled in the art. For example, a suitable speed sensor may include a sensor at every wheel that is averaged by controller 26. The controller may translate the wheel speeds into the speed of the vehicle. Yaw rate, steering angle, wheel speed and possibly a slip angle estimate at each wheel may be translated back to the speed of the vehicle at the center of gravity. Various other algorithms are known to those skilled in the art. Speed may also be obtained from a transmission sensor. For example, if speed is determined while speeding up or braking around a corner, the lowest or highest wheel speed may not be used because of its error. Also, a transmission sensor may be used to determine vehicle speed.

Load sensor 39 may be a load cell coupled to one or more suspension components. By measuring the stress, strain or weight on the load sensor a shifting of the load can be determined.

The roll condition of a vehicle can be characterized by the relative roll angle between the vehicle body and the wheel axle and the wheel departure angle (between the wheel axle and the average road surface). Both the relative roll angle and the wheel departure angle may be calculated in relative roll angle estimation module by using the roll rate and lateral acceleration sensor signals. If both the relative roll angle and the wheel departure angles are large enough, the vehicle may be in either single wheel lifting or double wheel lifting. On the other hand, if the magnitude of both angles is small enough, the wheels are likely all grounded. In case that both of them are not small and the double wheel lifting condition is detected or determined, the sum of those two angles will be used by the feedback control module to compute the desired actuation command for achieving rollover control performance.

The roll condition of a vehicle can be characterized by rolling radius-based wheel departure roll angle, which captures the angle between the wheel axle and the average road surface through the dynamic rolling radii of the left and right wheels when both of the wheels are grounded. Since the computation of the rolling radius is related to the wheel speed and the linear velocity of the wheel, such rolling-radius based wheel departure angle will assume abnormal values when there are large wheel slips. This happens when a wheel is lifted and there is torque applied to the wheel. Therefore, if this rolling radius-based wheel departure angle is increasing rapidly, the vehicle might have lifted wheels. Small magnitude of this angle indicates the wheels are all grounded.

The roll condition of the vehicle can be seen indirectly from the wheel longitudinal slip. If during a normal braking or driving torque the wheels at one side of the vehicle experience increased magnitude of slip, then the wheels of that side are losing longitudinal road torque. This implies that the wheels are either driven on a low mu surface or lifted up. The low mu surface condition and wheel-lifted-up condition can be further differentiated based on the chassis roll angle computation, i.e., in low mu surface, the chassis roll angle is usually very small. Hence, an accurate determination of chassis roll is desired.

The roll condition of the vehicle can be characterized by the normal loading sustained at each wheel. Theoretically, when a normal loading at a wheel decreases to zero, the wheel is no longer contacting the road surface. In this case a potential rollover is underway. Large magnitude of this loading indicates that the wheel is grounded. Normal loading is a function of the calculated chassis roll and pitch angles. Hence, an accurate determination of chassis roll and pitch angles is desired.

The roll condition can be identified by checking the actual road torques applied to the wheels and the road torques, which are needed to sustain the wheels when they are grounded. The actual road torques can be obtained through torque balancing for each wheel using wheel acceleration, driving torque and braking torque. If the wheel is contacting the road surface, the calculated actual road torques must match or be larger than the torques determined from the nonlinear torques calculated from the normal loading and the longitudinal slip at each wheel.

The roll condition of a vehicle can be characterized by the chassis roll angle itself, i.e., the relative roll angle θ_(xy) between the vehicle body and the wheel axle. If this chassis roll angle is increasing rapidly, the vehicle might be on the edge of wheel lifting or rollover. Small magnitude of this angle indicates the wheels are not lifted or are all grounded. Hence, an accurate determination of the chassis roll angle is beneficial for determining if the vehicle is in non-rollover events.

The roll condition of a vehicle can also be characterized by the roll angle between the wheel axle and the average road surface, this is called wheel departure angle. If the roll angle is increasing rapidly, the vehicle has lifted wheel or wheels and aggressive control action needs to be taken in order to prevent the vehicle from rolling over. Small magnitude of this angle indicates the wheels are not lifted.

The center of gravity C is also illustrated with nominal mass M. A roll axis is also illustrated at a distance D from the center of gravity. The symbol a_(y) is the lateral acceleration.

Referring now to FIG. 3, the relationship of the various angles of the vehicle 10 relative to the road surface 11 is illustrated. In the following, a reference road bank angle θ_(bank) is shown relative to the vehicle 10 on a road surface. The vehicle has a vehicle body 10 a and wheel axle 10 b. The wheel departure angle θ_(wda) is the angle between the wheel axle and the road. The relative roll angle θ_(xr) is the angle between the wheel axle 10 b and the body 10 a. The global roll angle θ_(x) is the angle between the horizontal plane (e.g., at sea level) and the vehicle body 10 a.

Another angle of importance is the linear bank angle. The linear bank angle is a bank angle that is calculated more frequently (perhaps in every loop) by subtracting the relative roll angle generated from a linear roll dynamics of a vehicle (see U.S. Pat. No. 6,556,908 which is incorporated by reference herein), from the calculated global roll angle (as one in U.S. Pat. No. 6,631,317, which is incorporated by reference herein). If all things were slowly changing without drifts, errors or the like, the linear bank angle and reference road bank angle terms would be equivalent.

Referring now to FIGS. 4 and 5, an automotive vehicle 10 is illustrated with various parameters illustrated thereon. A change in mass ΔM is illustrated relative to nominal center of gravity C₀. The center of gravity moves to C and the added mass ΔM is added thereto. The change in mass or load ΔM is positioned at a distance H above the load floor 80. The nominal center of gravity C₀ is located at position h above the load floor 80. The distance between the new center of gravity and the nominal center of gravity C₀ is ΔH.

The longitudinal acceleration is denoted by a_(x) whereas the longitudinal velocity is denoted v_(x). The lateral acceleration and lateral velocity is denoted by a_(y),v_(y) respectively. The steering wheel angle is denoted by δ_(w). The wheelbase of the vehicle is denoted by the symbol WB.

Referring now to FIG. 6, controller 26 is illustrated in further detail. Controller 26 receives the various sensor signals, for example, the roll rate, lateral acceleration, longitudinal acceleration and yaw rate from the respective sensor signals. From the sensor signals, the loading height and amount of loading, the roll gradient, roll rate parameter, roll acceleration coefficient and roll inertia may be determined. These terms may be used to generate a vehicle roll angle compensation term and a roll stability control gain/threshold compensation term. Instead of determining the load and height of the load, an adaptive roll acceleration coefficient and an adaptive roll gradient that inherently have the load and height of the load therein may be determined. As mentioned above, these values in prior systems were fixed without regard to loading. Here they are adaptively determined to correspond to the loading condition. For example, these terms may increase the sensitivity of the system due to a higher center of mass. As will be further described below, the controller uses the roll rate signal and performs a derivative in box 84 to generate the roll acceleration signal {dot over (ω)}_(x), which is then filtered by the first filter 86 to generate the variable X, which is provided to a conditionality averaging box 88. The lateral acceleration signal is filtered in the second filter and provided to the conditionality averaging box 88 illustrated as Y. The longitudinal acceleration is filtered in the third filter number 92 and provided to conditionality averaging box 88. As will be further described below, the conditional averaging box generates signals that are coupled to a least squares fit determination 98 which provides variables α and β. The variables α and β are provided to a loading/loading height detection block 100. The conditional averaging block and least squares fit block 98 illustrate a first conditional least square method illustrated by box 99. The loading/loading height detection block 100 generates a vehicle roll angle compensation term 102 and an RSC control gain/threshold compensation term 104.

Referring now to FIG. 7, the operation of the controller 26 is described in further detail. In step 102, the various sensors such as the roll rate sensor, the lateral acceleration sensor, longitudinal acceleration sensor and yaw rate sensor are read.

The roll signal for control is calculated as the (θ_(x)−θ_(refbank)), i.e., the subtraction of the reference bank angle from the global roll angle. The roll signal for control may be used to control the roll stability control system or other system or device.

As mentioned above, the various errors not limited to integration, calculation and drift may enter into the various signals at various times. Thus, in certain situations the wheel departure angle or the reference bank angle may not be accurate. The following description describes how these values can be updated in response to wheel lift/wheel grounded values.

In step 104, the roll gradient, roll acceleration coefficient computation and a roll rate parameter are determined.

There are two roll angle computations in the roll stability control: one is the relative roll angle as computed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,556,908 and the other is the global roll angle computation as computed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,631,317. U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,556,908 and 6,631,317 are incorporated by reference herein. The relative roll angle is a function of the lateral acceleration a_(y), the roll acceleration {dot over (ω)}_(x), the roll rate ω_(x), the roll gradient α and the roll acceleration coefficient β and a roll rate coefficient η. That is,

θ_(xr) =f(a _(y){dot over (ω)}_(x);α,β,η,ω_(x))  (1)

In z-transformation,

θ_(xr) =αT _(roll)(z)a _(y) −βT _(roll)(z){dot over (ω)}_(x)  (2)

where T_(roll)(z) is a filter which reflects the linear roll model of the vehicle, i.e., it includes the roll stiffness and damping effect due to suspension dynamics. Based on the roll dynamics, the following is true:

${\theta_{xr} + {\frac{D_{roll}}{K_{roll}}{\overset{.}{\theta}}_{xr}}} = {{\alpha \; a_{y}} + {\beta \; {\overset{.}{\omega}}_{x}}}$

Performing a Laplace transform to convert this equation into the frequency domain equation, leads to the following computation

θ_(xr)(s)=T _(Roll)(s)(αa _(y)(s)+β{dot over (ω)}_(x)(s)),

(s)) where the transfer function T_(Roll) is

${T_{Roll}(s)} = \frac{1}{1 + {\eta \; s}}$

with the roll rate coefficient η is defined as

$\eta = \frac{D_{roll}}{K_{roll}}$

Using the algorithm shown in U.S. Pat. No. 6,631,317, the global roll angle θ_(x) (the roll angle of the vehicle body with respect to sea level) can be obtained through an anti-drift integration of the Euler roll angle velocity (which is different from the roll angular rate) and a roll reference signal through a steady-state recovery filter. On level ground when the vehicle does not have wheels in the air, such a calculated global roll angle is the same as the chassis roll angle when the vehicle roll dynamics is within its linear range (for example, the cornering acceleration of the vehicle is under 0.35 g).

Therefore, on level ground when the vehicle does not have wheels in the air and the vehicle has moderate cornering acceleration, the algorithm used to compute global roll angle as in U.S. Pat. No. 6,631,317 is a function of the roll rate ω_(x), the yaw rate ω_(z), the relative roll angle θ_(xr) and the relative pitch angle θ_(yr)

θ_(x) g(ω_(y),ω_(z),θ_(xr),θ_(yr))  (3)

In z-transformation, such a computation can be expressed as in the following format

θ_(x) =T _(adi)(z)[ω_(x)+ω_(z)θ_(yr) ]+T _(ssc)(z)θ_(xr)  (4)

where T_(adi)(z) is the so-called steady-state recovery filter which is used to recover the good low frequency portion of the roll angle removed by the anti-drift-integration filter. Here the relative roll angle (chassis roll angle) θ_(xr) is used to recover the true steady state value of the roll angle.

Notice that on level ground if the vehicle is driven without wheel lifting and with moderate cornering acceleration, the relative roll angle and the global roll angle are equal. Therefore, from equations (1) and (3) or (2) and (4), the relationships between the roll gradient α, the roll acceleration coefficient β, and the roll rate coefficient η may be found.

Although the computation of the roll gradient α and the roll acceleration coefficient β is the main focus of this disclosure, the roll rate coefficient η can be similarly determined. It can be adaptively determined independent of the determination α and β, or simultaneously determined together with α and β. Likewise α and β can be independently determined.

Substituting (2) into (4), the following is obtained

θ_(x) =T _(adi)(z)[ω_(x)+ω_(z)θ_(yr) ]+αT _(ssc)(z)a _(y) −βT _(ssc)(z)T _(roll)(z){dot over (ω)}_(x)  (5)

where the relative pitch θ_(yr) is a function of the longitudinal acceleration and the pitch acceleration as in the following (see U.S. Pat. No. 6,556,908 for detail)

θ_(yr) =m(a _(x),{dot over (ω)}_(y);κ,λ)  (6)

and which can be further written as

θ_(yr) =κT _(pitch)(z)a _(x) +λT _(pitch)(z){dot over (ω)}_(y)  (7)

where T_(pitch)(z) is a filter which reflects the linear pitch model of the vehicle, i.e., it includes the pitch stiffness and damping effect due to the vehicle suspension dynamics. T_(pitch)(z) is different for vehicle deceleration and acceleration, i.e.,

$\begin{matrix} {{T_{pitch}(z)} = \left\{ \begin{matrix} {T_{pitchacc}(z)} & {{{if}\mspace{14mu} a_{x}} > 0} \\ {T_{pitchdec}(z)} & {{{if}\mspace{14mu} a_{x}} \leq 0} \end{matrix} \right.} & (8) \end{matrix}$

and the same is true for the pitch gradient κ and the pitch acceleration coefficient λ

$\begin{matrix} {\kappa = \left\{ {{\begin{matrix} \kappa_{acc} & {{{if}\mspace{14mu} a_{x}} > 0} \\ \kappa_{dec} & {{{if}\mspace{14mu} a_{x}} \leq 0} \end{matrix}\lambda} = \left\{ \begin{matrix} \lambda_{acc} & {{{if}\mspace{14mu} a_{x}} > 0} \\ \lambda_{dec} & {{{if}\mspace{14mu} a_{x}} \leq 0} \end{matrix} \right.} \right.} & (9) \end{matrix}$

If the pitch angular rate ω_(y) is not available, the above relative pitch θ_(yr) can be approximated as in the following

θ_(yr) ≈κT _(pitch)(z)a _(x)  (10)

which is acceptably accurate at low frequency region (pitch acceleration term only provides high frequency contents).

By equating (2) and (5) on level ground, θ_(x)=θ_(xr), the following equation is obtained

αX=βT=U  (11)

where

X=T _(roll)(z)(1−T _(ssc)(z))a _(y)

Y=T _(roll)(z)(1−T _(ssc)(z)){dot over (ω)}_(x)

U=T _(adi)(z)[ω_(x)+ω_(z)θ_(yr)]  (12)

The following is a summary of the computation algorithm.

In step 106, the filtered lateral acceleration X is determined in the following iterative equation

X _(k) =d ₁₁ X _(k−1) +d ₁₂ X _(k−2) +d ₁₃ X _(k−3) +n ₁₁ a _(y) _(k) +n ₁₂ a _(y) _(k−1) +n ₁₃ a _(y) _(k−2) +n ₁₄ a _(y) _(k−3)   (13)

where d_(1i),n_(1i) for i=1, 2, 3, 4 are the involved first set of the filter coefficients.

In step 108, the filtered roll acceleration Y as is determined in the following iterative equation

Y=d ₁₁ Y _(k−1) +d ₁₂ Y _(k−2) +d ₁₃ Y _(k−3) +n ₁₁{dot over (ω)}_(x) _(k) +n ₁₂{dot over (ω)}_(x) _(k−1) +n ₁₃{dot over (ω)}_(x) _(k−2) +n ₁₄{dot over (ω)}_(x) _(k−3)   (14)

In step 110 the filtered roll angle velocity, which is the sum of the roll rate and the product of the relative pitch and yaw rate, may be calculated in the following iterative algorithm

U=d ₂₁ U _(k−1) +d ₂₂ U _(k−2) +d ₂₃ U _(k−3) +n ₂₁ R _(k) +n ₂₂ R _(k−1) +n ₂₃ R _(k−2) +n ₂₄ R _(k−3)  (15)

where R_(k) is the total roll angle velocity at the kth time instant on level ground, i.e.,

R _(k)=ω_(k) _(x) +ω_(z) _(k) θ_(yr) _(k)   (16)

where d_(2i),n_(2i) for i=1, 2, 3, 4 are the involved 2^(nd) set of the filter coefficients. If the approximation (10) is used, the total roll velocity on level ground can be approximated as in the following

R _(k)≈ω_(x) _(k) _(+κω) _(z) _(k) T _(pitch)(z)a _(x) _(k)   (17)

Using the calculated filtered value X_(k),Y_(k) and U_(k) at each sampling instant k, equation (11) can be used to potentially compute the unknown parameters of the roll gradient α, the roll acceleration coefficient β if the roll rate coefficient η is determined independent of the determination of α and β. A more complicated method is needed in order to obtain α, β and η simultaneously. One method to compute the unknown values α and β in equation (11) is the so-called least-square method.

Since equation (11) is true when the vehicle is driven on level ground and the vehicle does not have any wheel in the air (4 tires are contacting the road), a conditional least-square (CLS) method is used. Two CLS's may be used. The first CLS method conduct α and β parameter updating after a fixed number of conditional samples, while the second method updates α and β and resets a covariance matrix at each conditional sample.

Referring to FIG. 6A, the second conditional least square method is illustrated by box 250. Blocks 84, 86, 90 are the same as in FIG. 6. This embodiment, however, uses a relative pitch signal instead of the longitudinal acceleration signal. The relative pitch signal and yaw rate signal are multiplied in block 252. The output of block 252 is added to the roll rate in addition to block 95′ and filtered in block 96′. The filtered signals from blocks 86, 90, 96′ are provided to a conditional covariance block 254. The block 254 output is provided to roll gradient, roll acceleration coefficient least square updating block 256, which provides an output to block 100.

Since α and β are related to the inertia parameters of the vehicle body roll motion, only if the vehicle roll mode is fully excited α and β can be identified correctly through least-square methods. Hence, under the steady-state driving condition, the least-square identification is not conducted. Therefore, a further condition reflecting vehicle roll dynamic condition is needed. Considering the driver's steering input could induce roll dynamics, one of such conditions can be characterized using the steering wheel angle velocity, i.e., only if

|{dot over (δ)}_(w)|≧δ_(wxmin)

the CLS method will be conducted, δ_(w) is the measured steering wheel angle, δ_(wvmin) is a threshold (for example, 20 degree per second).

In step 114, the conditional sum of the products or cross products of the above filtered variables are determined over a significant large number N of the conditional samples. This is performed using the following iterative algorithm if the first CLS method is used

$\begin{matrix} {\begin{matrix} {{if}\left( \mspace{14mu} {{{{{\overset{.}{\delta}}_{w}} \geq \delta_{wvmin}}\&}\mspace{14mu} {level}\mspace{14mu} {ground}} \right.} \\ {{\&\mspace{14mu} {no}\mspace{14mu} {wheel}\mspace{14mu} {lifting}}} \\ \left. {{\&\mspace{14mu} s} \leq N}\mspace{31mu} \right) \end{matrix}\left\{ \mspace{14mu} {a_{11_{s + 1}} = {{a_{11_{s}} + {X_{k}^{2}\mspace{14mu} a_{21_{s + 1}}}} = {{a_{21_{s}} - {X_{k}Y_{k}\mspace{14mu} a_{22_{s + 1}}}} = {{a_{22_{s}} + {Y_{k}^{2}\mspace{14mu} b_{1_{s + 1}}}} = {{b_{1_{s}} + {X_{k}U_{k}\mspace{14mu} b_{2_{s + 1}}}} = {{b_{2_{s}} - {Y_{k}U_{k}\mspace{14mu} s}} = {s + 1}}}}}}} \right\}} & (18) \end{matrix}$

Notice that the time instant denoted by k is different from the CLS updating instant denoted by s. Only if the conditions are satisfied all the time, then s=k. N in (18) is the total number of conditional samples used for CLS, which could be from 1000 to 80,000.

Step 114 is performed for the conditional sample when the road is a level ground. The level ground can be identified if there is an indication that the vehicle is not on a significantly banked road. Therefore, checking road bank can be used for this purpose, for example, using the method disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,718,248. The level ground can also be checked through a flatness index (as the one calculated in U.S. Pat. No. 6,718,248), or a road profile detection (see U.S. Pat. No. 6,718,248), or a rough comparison between the global roll angle and the nominal chassis roll angle.

In step 116, the nominal values for α₀ and β₀ of the roll gradient and roll acceleration coefficient are calculated. They can also be obtained by using test data from the vehicle with nominal loading condition and nominal configuration.

In step 118, the roll gradient α and the roll acceleration coefficient β are computed as in the following

$\begin{matrix} {{{{if}\mspace{14mu} s} = N}\left\{ \mspace{14mu} {{D = {\min \left( {{\max \left( {{a_{11_{N}} - \frac{a_{21_{N}}^{2}}{\max \left( {a_{22_{N}},a_{\min}} \right)}},{- a_{\min}}} \right)},a_{\min}} \right)}};\mspace{14mu} {\alpha = {\min \left( {{\max \left( {{\left( {b_{1_{N}} - \frac{a_{21_{N}}b_{2_{N}}}{\max \left( {a_{22_{N}},a_{\min}} \right)}} \right)D^{- 1}},\underset{\_}{\alpha}} \right)},\overset{\_}{\alpha}} \right)}};\mspace{20mu} {\beta = {\min \left( {{\max \left( {{\begin{pmatrix} {\frac{a_{11_{N}}b_{2_{N}}}{\max \left( {a_{22_{N}},a_{\min}} \right)} -} \\ \frac{a_{21_{N}}b_{1_{N}}}{\max \left( {a_{22_{N}},a_{\min}} \right)} \end{pmatrix}D^{- 1}},\underset{\_}{\beta}} \right)},\overset{\_}{\beta}} \right)}};\mspace{14mu} {s = 0};\mspace{11mu} {a_{11_{s}} = 0};{a_{21_{s}} = 0};{a_{22_{s}} = 0};\; \mspace{14mu} {b_{1_{s}} = 0};{b_{2_{s}} = 0};} \right\}} & (19) \end{matrix}$

where a_(min) is a small number (for example, 0.0001), which is used to remove division by zero in the implemented computation; α and α are the respective lower and upper bounds of the roll gradient, which can be calculated as

α=α₀−Δα

α=α₀+Δα  (20)

and α₀ is the nominal value of the roll gradient (obtained through vehicle testing for the vehicle with nominal loading), Δα is the allowed variation of the roll gradient; β and β are the respective lower and upper bounds of the roll acceleration coefficient, which can be obtained as

β=β₀−Δβ

β=β_(0+Δβ)  (21)

and β₀ is the nominal value of the roll acceleration coefficient (for vehicle with nominal loading), Δβ is the allowed variation of the roll acceleration coefficient. If the second CLS method is used, the roll gradient α and the roll acceleration coefficient β can be calculated in block 256 through the following iterative algorithm. First, a 2 by 2 matrix variable V_(s+1) at the (s+1)th conditional time instant is calculated from its past value V_(s) and the calculated filtered values of X_(k) and Y_(k) as in the following

$\begin{matrix} {\begin{matrix} {{if}\left( \mspace{14mu} {{{{{\overset{.}{\delta}}_{w}} \geq \delta_{wvmin}}\&}\mspace{14mu} {level}\mspace{14mu} {ground}} \right.} \\ {{\&\mspace{14mu} {no}\mspace{14mu} {wheel}\mspace{14mu} {lifting}}} \\ \left. {{\&\mspace{14mu} s} \leq N}\mspace{31mu} \right) \end{matrix}\left\{ \mspace{14mu} {{{{if}\mspace{14mu} \left( {s = 0} \right)\mspace{31mu} \left\{ \mspace{14mu} {{V_{0} = \begin{bmatrix} v_{0} & 0 \\ 0 & v_{0} \end{bmatrix}};}\mspace{14mu} \right\} \mspace{14mu} V_{s + 1}} = {V_{s} - {g\frac{{V_{s}\begin{bmatrix} X_{k}^{2} & {{- X_{k}}Y_{k}} \\ {{- X_{k}}Y_{k}} & Y_{k}^{2} \end{bmatrix}}V_{s}}{1 + {{\gamma \left\lbrack {X_{k}\mspace{14mu} - Y_{k}} \right\rbrack}{V_{s}\left\lbrack {X_{k}\mspace{14mu} - Y_{k}} \right\rbrack}^{T}}}}}};} \right\}} & (22) \end{matrix}$

where g, γ and v₀ are three positive numbers, and the time instant k denotes the regular time instant and the time instant s is the conditional time instant. Equation (22) is also called the covariance resetting in the normalized least square algorithm.

The roll gradient and the roll acceleration coefficient are calculated using the 2 by 2 matrix V_(S), and the calculated filtered values X_(k), Y_(k) and U_(k), as in the following

$\begin{matrix} {\begin{matrix} {{if}\left( \mspace{14mu} {{{{{\overset{.}{\delta}}_{w}} \geq \delta_{wvmin}}\&}\mspace{14mu} {level}\mspace{14mu} {ground}} \right.} \\ {{\&\mspace{14mu} {no}\mspace{14mu} {wheel}\mspace{14mu} {lifting}}} \\ \left. {{\&\mspace{14mu} s} \leq N}\mspace{31mu} \right) \end{matrix}\left\{ \mspace{14mu} {{\begin{bmatrix} \alpha_{s + 1} \\ \beta_{s + 1} \end{bmatrix} = {\begin{bmatrix} \alpha_{s} \\ \beta_{s} \end{bmatrix} - {g\frac{{S_{s}\left\lbrack {X_{k} - Y_{k}} \right\rbrack}^{T}U_{k}}{1 + {{\gamma \left\lbrack {X_{k} - Y_{k}} \right\rbrack}{S_{s}\left\lbrack {X_{k} - Y_{k}} \right\rbrack}^{T}}}}}};} \right\}} & (23) \end{matrix}$

The calculated values are also limited to within their feasible sets as in the following

α_(s+1)=sat(α_(s+1),α₀−Δα,α₀+Δα)

β_(s+1)=sat(α_(s+1),β₀−Δβ,β₀+Δβ)  (24)

Notice that during the time instant where the conditions for (22) and (23) do not hold, the computations are frozen to the last values. That is if the following conditions are not true at a time instant k

$\begin{matrix} \begin{pmatrix} {{{\overset{.}{\delta}}_{w}} \geq \delta_{wvmin}} & {\&\mspace{11mu} {level}\mspace{14mu} {ground}} \\ \; & {{\&\mspace{11mu} {no}\mspace{14mu} {wheel}\mspace{14mu} {lifting}}} \\ \; & {{\&\mspace{11mu} s} \leq N} \end{pmatrix} & (25) \end{matrix}$

then computation in (2), (23) and (24) are not conducted, and the involved variables will keep the value for the last conditional sample s

V_(k)=V_(s);

α_(k)=α_(s);

β_(k)=β_(s).  (26)

From the calculated roll gradient and the roll acceleration coefficient, the vehicle loading and its distance to the center of gravity of the vehicle body in the vertical direction can be determined in the following in step 122.

From FIG. 4, M_(s) is the vehicle body mass and the height of the center of gravity C₀ of the car body is denoted as h which is measured in the vertical direction with respect to the vehicle floor. A loading of mass ΔM is added to the vehicle. The distance between the center of gravity of this mass relative to the vehicle floor is denoted as H. The center of gravity C of the vehicle body is likely to change due to the added mass ΔM. The distance between C₀ and C is denoted as ΔH. Then ΔH must satisfy the following relationship;

$\begin{matrix} {{\Delta \; H} = {\frac{\Delta \; M}{M_{s} + {\Delta \; M}}\left( {H - h} \right)}} & (27) \end{matrix}$

that is, the unknown ΔH can be readily obtained from the added mass ΔM, the height of the added mass H, the center of gravity height h of the vehicle body and the vehicle mass M_(s) prior to the addition of the mass ΔM.

The total roll inertial momentum of the vehicle body with respect to the final center of gravity C can be expressed as

I _(xc) =I _(xc) ^(M) +I _(xc) ^(ΔM)  (28)

where

I _(xc) ^(M) =I _(xc0) +M _(s) ΔH ²

I _(xc) ^(ΔM) =ΔM(H−h−ΔH)²  (29)

By inserting equation (27) into equation (29), equation (28) can be expressed as the following

$\begin{matrix} {I_{xc} = {I_{{xc}\; 0} + \frac{M_{s}\Delta \; {M\left( {H - h} \right)}^{2}}{M_{s} + {\Delta \; M}}}} & (30) \end{matrix}$

The nominal roll gradient and the roll acceleration coefficient is α₀ and β₀. Then

$\begin{matrix} {{\alpha_{0} = \frac{M_{s}h}{K_{roll}}}{\beta_{0} = \frac{I_{x}}{K_{roll}}}} & (31) \end{matrix}$

where K_(roll) denotes the roll stiffness due to suspension and anti-roll bar. Using those nominal values and the calculated values α and β, the loading mass and the loading distance satisfy the following

$\begin{matrix} {{{\Delta \; {MH}} = {{K_{roll}\left( {\alpha - \alpha_{0}} \right)} = A}}{\frac{\Delta \; {{MM}_{s}\left( {H - h} \right)}^{2}}{M_{s} + {\Delta \; M}} = {{K_{roll}\left( {\beta - \beta_{0}} \right)} = B}}} & (32) \end{matrix}$

From the relationship in equation (32), the following estimations may be determined

$\begin{matrix} \left\{ \begin{matrix} {H = {h + \frac{B}{2\; A} + \sqrt{{\frac{1}{4}\left( \frac{B}{A} \right)^{2}} + {h\left( \frac{B}{A} \right)} + \left( \frac{B}{M_{s}} \right)^{2}}}} \\ {{\Delta \; M} = \frac{\alpha}{h + \frac{B}{2\; \alpha} + \sqrt{{\frac{1}{4}\left( \frac{B}{A} \right)^{2}} + {h\left( \frac{B}{A} \right)} + \left( \frac{B}{M_{s}} \right)^{2}}}} \end{matrix} \right. & (33) \end{matrix}$

In step 124, the height H of the added mass (ΔM) from the vehicle floor based on the first equation of (33) is determined.

In step 126, the added mass ΔM is determined based on the second equation of (33) by using the calculated height H of the added mass.

In step 128, a safety system such as a roll stability control system is controlled in response to the added mass and the height of the added mass. The safety system may also be controlled directly from the roll gradient and roll rate parameter, both of which may be adaptive. The safety system may also include the roll acceleration coefficient which may also be adaptive as a factor in addition to the adaptive roll gradient and adaptive roll rate parameter. A vehicle roll angle compensation term may be determined such as that shown above. The vehicle roll angle compensation term may sensitize the roll angle computation for earlier deployments. The amount of roll compensation will depend on the particular vehicle and the characteristics of such things as the suspension and configuration of the vehicle. A roll stability control gain/threshold compensation term may also be generated. The threshold may be changed to allow earlier deployment if an added mass at a predetermined height is determined in steps 124 and 126. The amount of compensation will likely be determined experimentally based on the vehicle configuration.

Thus, as can be seen, the roll signal for control may be adjusted according to the vehicle loading and its height. On the other hand if the vehicle has a significant amount of loading, i.e., the calculated loading exceeds a threshold L_(max)

ΔM≧L_(max)  (34)

and at the same time the height of the mass exceeds another threshold H_(max)

H≧H_(max)  (35)

then in addition to the adjusted computation of roll signal for control (through the adjustment of the chassis roll angle using the new roll gradient and roll acceleration coefficient), all the gains for the feedback control used for commanding the actuators are set to a set of values G_(RLMAX) tuned for larger roof loadings, or adaptively adjusted in high values based on the amount of ΔM. In this way, when the vehicle has double wheel lift, the proper amount of actuation will be requested so the vehicle achieves robust roll stability control function during rollover event involving vehicles with large roof loadings.

If the vehicle has a significant loading, i.e., ΔM≧L_(max), but the loading is a floor loading, that is, the height of the loading is smaller than a lower threshold H_(min)

H≦H_(min)  (36)

all the gains for the feedback control used for commanding the actuators are set to a set of values G_(FLMAX) tuned for larger floor loadings.

If the vehicle has a significant loading, i.e., ΔM≧L_(max), but the loading height is between the roof and floor, i.e., H is between a lower threshold H_(min) (possibly zero) and the higher threshold H_(max)

H_(min)≦H≦H_(max)  (37)

all the gains for the feedback control used for commanding the actuators are set to the following values adjusted based on the detected loading height as in the following

$\begin{matrix} {G_{H} = {G_{FLMAX} + {\frac{H - H_{\min}}{H_{\max} - H_{\min}}\left( {G_{RLMAX} - G_{FLMAX}} \right)}}} & (38) \end{matrix}$

If the vehicle has a roof loading which is below the maximum allowed roof loading L_(max) but above the lower bound of a valid roof loading L_(min), i.e.,

L_(min)≦ΔM≦L_(max)  (39)

Assume all the nominal gains for feedback (for the vehicle with nominal loading) are denoted as G_(nom), then the control gains will be adjusted based on the detected roof loading as in the following

$\begin{matrix} {G_{\Delta \; M} = {G_{nom} + {\frac{{\Delta \; M} - L_{\min}}{L_{\max} - L_{\min}}\left( {G_{RLMAX} - G_{nom}} \right)}}} & (40) \end{matrix}$

The roll gradient itself can also be directly used to adjust control gains. If the vehicle has a significant increase of roll gradient, i.e., α≧α_(min), then all the gains for the feedback control used for commanding the actuators are set to the following values adjusted based on the detected roll gradient as in the following

$\begin{matrix} {G_{\alpha} = {G_{\alpha \; {MIN}} + {\frac{\alpha - \alpha_{\min}}{\alpha_{\max} - \alpha_{\min}}\left( {G_{\alpha \; {MAX}} - G_{\alpha \; {MAX}}} \right)}}} & (41) \end{matrix}$

where α_(min) is the roll gradient corresponding to a vehicle without roof loading and α_(max) is the roll gradient corresponding to the vehicle with maximum roof loading allowed.

The roll gradient itself can also be directly used to adjust control gains. If the vehicle has a significant increase of roll gradient, i.e., α≧α_(min), then all the gains for the feedback control used for commanding the actuators are set to the following values adjusted based on the detected roll gradient as in the following

$\begin{matrix} {G_{\alpha} = {G_{\alpha \; {MIN}} + {\frac{\alpha - \alpha_{\min}}{\alpha_{\max} - \alpha_{\min}}\left( {G_{\alpha \; {MAX}} - G_{\alpha \; {MAX}}} \right)}}} & (41) \end{matrix}$

where α_(min) is the roll gradient corresponding to a vehicle without roof loading and α_(max) is the roll gradient corresponding to the vehicle with maximum roof loading allowed.

Notice that the control gain adjustments other than the above listed linear interpolation methods are possible. Also, notice that the dead-bands and thresholds used in roll stability feedback control can also be similarly adjusted based on the loading height H and/or the loading ΔM, or the roll gradient, or the roll moment of inertia calculated as in (30).

Combining those control gain, dead-band and threshold adjustments with the quantitative roll angle (for example, the chassis roll) adjustment, a robust roll stability control function can be achieved.

Notice that based on the aforementioned computation of the added mass and its vertical from the vehicle floor, the roll moment of inertia of the vehicle body can be readily calculated as in (30). Alternatively, the roll moment of inertia I_(xx) can be determined directly by using the equation

M _(s) a _(y) h _(cg) −K _(roll)θ_(xr) −D _(roll){dot over (θ)}_(xr) =I _(xx){dot over (ω)}_(x)  (42)

where M_(s) is vehicle mass, a_(y) is the measured lateral acceleration, h_(cg) is the center of mass height above the roll center_(, K) _(roll) is the roll stiffness of the suspension, θ_(xr) is the relative roll of the body with respect to the wheels (or ground), D_(roll) is the roll damping of the suspension, {dot over (θ)}_(xr) is the relative roll velocity and {dot over (ω)}_(x) the roll acceleration (obtained by differentiating the roll rate obtained from the roll rate sensor), and I_(xx) is the roll inertia, in kg-m².

When a_(y) and θ_(xr) are zero but {dot over (θ)}_(xr) and {dot over (ω)}_(x) are non-zero, then

I _(Xx) =−D _(roll){dot over (θ)}_(xr)/{dot over (ω)}  (43)

Or, when θ_(xr) and {dot over (θ)}_(xr) are zero and the mass, m_(s) is determined by another means,

I _(xx) =M _(s) a _(y) h _(cg)/{dot over (ω)}_(x)  (44)

Alternatively, the roll response of the vehicle, obtained from the roll rate sensor, can be analyzed in the frequency domain to determine roll gradient and roll acceleration coefficient:

ω_(d)=the damped natural frequency of the roll motion of the vehicle (Hz)

ω_(n)=the undamped natural frequency of the roll motion of the vehicle (Hz)

ζ=the damping ratio of the roll motion of the vehicle (unitless)

Taking the Laplace transform of

$\begin{matrix} {{\theta_{xr} + {\frac{D_{roll}}{K_{roll}}{\overset{.}{\theta}}_{xr}}} = {{\frac{M_{s}h_{cg}}{K_{roll}}a_{y}} - {\frac{I_{xx}}{K_{roll}}{\overset{.}{\omega}}_{x}}}} & (45) \end{matrix}$

and rearranging yields the following by considering {dot over (ω)}_(x)≈{umlaut over (θ)}_(xr) when the vehicle does not have large pitch motion or the vehicle does not have large yaw rate:

$\begin{matrix} \begin{matrix} {\frac{\Theta_{xr}(s)}{A_{y}(s)} = \frac{1}{{\frac{I_{xx}}{M_{s}h_{cg}}s^{2}} + {\frac{D_{roll}}{m_{s}h_{cgs}}s} + \frac{K_{roll}}{m_{s}h_{cgs}}}} \\ {= {\left( \frac{M_{s}h_{cg}}{K_{roll}} \right)\frac{1}{{\frac{I_{xx}}{K_{roll}}s^{2}} + {\frac{D_{roll}}{K_{roll}}s} + 1}}} \end{matrix} & (46) \end{matrix}$

where Θ_(xr)(s) and A_(y)(s) are the Laplace transform of the θ_(xr) and a_(y), respectively.

Using a digital fast Fourier transform to construct a frequency response function and determine the magnitude of

$\frac{\Theta_{xr}(s)}{A_{y}(s)}$

vs. frequency, the roll gradient is equal to the DC gain (Equation 7 evaluated at s=0).

The peak of the magnitude of the frequency response function will occur at the damped natural frequency,

ω_(d)=ω_(n)√{square root over (1−ζ²)}  (47)

where ω_(n) is the undamped natural frequency and ζ is the damping ratio. (Alternatively, the damped natural frequency can be determined from “impulse-like” inputs into the suspension (hitting a bump in the road or a pot-hole), and determining the frequency of the roll oscillations.) From (45), ω_(n) is related to the roll acceleration coefficient β

$\begin{matrix} {\omega_{n} = {\left. \sqrt{\frac{K_{roll}}{I_{xx}}}\Rightarrow\frac{I_{xx}}{K_{Roll}} \right. = {\frac{1}{\omega_{n}^{2}} = {- \beta}}}} & (48) \\ {ϛ = \frac{\omega_{n}D_{roll}}{2\; K_{roll}}} & (49) \end{matrix}$

Substituting Equation (49) into Equation (47) gives

$\begin{matrix} {\omega_{d} = {\omega_{n}\sqrt{1 - \frac{\omega_{n}D_{roll}^{2}}{2\; K_{roll}}}}} & (50) \end{matrix}$

Equation (50) can be solved for ω_(n), which can in turn be used to evaluate Equation (48) and solve for the roll acceleration coefficient β.

Another way to determine roll inertia is to use an indirect empirical approach. First, a mass is determined, then the inertia may be correlated to mass. That is, a first estimate mass is determined via a method such as that described in Invention Disclosure (203-0482) filed as U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/849,590, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein, or another method. Then the inertia may be obtained per various methods explained below:

a. Assume inertia changes as mass changes from its base values, m_(s) _(—) _(base) to the current value, m_(s) _(—) _(current) as:

I _(xx) _(—) _(total) =I _(xx) _(—) _(base) +h ₂(m _(s) _(—) _(current) −m _(s) _(—) _(base))  (51)

where h₂ is assumed to be a constant. Based on testing for a vehicle loaded several ways, an average may then be used.

b. Correlate roll inertia, I_(xx), to vehicle mass; e.g., via testing using a vehicle inertial measurement facility to get roll inertia, the mass for various loading conditions and roof loads may be correlated. This is based on the premise that you can only load an SUV so many ways (e.g., mass above curb loading must be placed in vehicle seats and/or on the roof rack). Again, the vehicle mass may be determined via a method described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/849,590 or another method, then use the roll inertia, I_(xx), corresponding to that mass obtained from testing.

The currently estimated mass or roll inertia estimate can be used several ways in the RSC algorithm, including:

Improved state estimation: Since mass and inertia values are used in the roll, pitch, and yaw angle state estimates, values accurately reflecting the actual vehicle will improve the accuracy, improve RSC control, and reduce the occurrence of false interventions.

Modified thresholds for activation: For example, a fully loaded vehicle can be less stable in roll. Hence, tighter thresholds on roll angle and roll rate, for example, can be used. This will increase the level of RSC control for the same level of roll angle and velocity for the loaded vehicle.

c. Increased gains for the RSC PID and/or Transition controllers.

d. Less stringent entry conditions for PID or Transition control intervention.

e. Any combination of the above.

Referring now to FIG. 8, determination of a roll condition parameter such as roll gradient, roll acceleration coefficient, roll rate coefficient, roll inertia mass or center of gravity height may be determined on an iterative basis and in a conditional least square sense so that the data is averaged and summed over a long period of time. The longer the data is averaged and summed the more robust the estimates may be in response to the uncertainties, the road variations, the noise and the unnecessary screened conditions. However, due to the conflicting requirement for averaging (longer period of averaging leads to more robust estimates but needs longer time to find the true parameter) and for fast detection, there must be a trade-off between the length of data used in the conditional least square algorithm in order to obtain timely indication of loading changes. That is, in order to achieve a fast detection of the changes in the estimates, the length of the data used in the conditional least square algorithm needs to be short, while short data length provides less reliable and robust estimates. On the other hand, the accumulative sum of the products of the involved variables in the conditional least square algorithm could cause computation overflow if the sum is kept going without re-initialization. A fixed data length N (for example, a number between 1000 and 100,000) could be used for resetting or re-initialization. That is, every N steps (where the screening condition are true), the conditional least square computation may be restarted. Notice that in some driving conditions, a reliable computation can be achieved without using all the N data points. On the other hand, if there is a strong indication that the vehicle has not changed loading condition during a trip, a re-initialization would forget the information gained during last computation and delay a potentially timely detection. For this reason, a qualitative detection of a roll condition parameter change is further used to eliminate resetting when it is clearly not necessary. That is, the conditional least square algorithm provides a quantitative determination of the vehicle roll parameters and loading related parameters upon the qualitative determination of loading change. More specifically, the re-initialization used in the conditional least square algorithm is conducted upon the qualitative determination of the roll parameter and loading changes, if there is any, otherwise, the normal N data points will be used.

For example, vehicle loading can only be changed when the vehicle is stopped. Hence, each time the vehicle comes to a stop a potential for a vehicle loading change might be presented. For that reason, the qualitative determination might be initiated when the vehicle is stopped. Thus, FIG. 8 sets forth a method for qualitatively determining a potential load change condition of the vehicle. Essentially, when a load change is qualitatively determined or a potential for a load change is qualitatively determined, the conditional least square algorithm will reset the variables involved in the cumulative sums to zero so that a new running average used in the conditional least square algorithm may be determined. As is set forth below, the load change is determined indirectly so an additional load sensor or sensors do not need to be added to the vehicle.

In step 200, a potential load change condition is qualitatively determined by observing various operation or dynamics states and sensor signals in the vehicle. Since the vehicle loading changes are usually conducted by the occupants or the driver from the vehicle, the vehicle door ajar would be one of the conditions for initiating loading change. Therefore, a qualitative determination of the loading change includes checking if door ajar signals from the door/tailgate sensor 41 are present.

The longitudinal acceleration of the vehicle relative to the estimated driveshaft torque may also provide an indication of a load change. Hence, another qualitative determination of the loading change involves checking if the longitudinal acceleration measured from the sensor 36 deviates much from the one computed based on the driveshaft torque divided by the nominal vehicle loading and mass.

The low frequency aspect of the suspension height or suspension position sensor 40 may also be used to provide an indication of a change in load. Hence, another qualitative determination of the vehicle loading change involves checking if low pass filtered suspension height sensor signals are below a certain threshold, which can be obtained through vehicle tests or experiments.

The transmission controller 42 may also provide transmission data which changes based upon loading. A direct signal may be generated from the transmission controller 42. Therefore another qualitative determination of loading change involves checking vehicle transmission information together with vehicle longitudinal acceleration, driveshaft torque, etc.

Another qualitative determination 59 of the potential load change involves checking a change in the vehicle shift data together with other vehicle dynamics states.

The vehicle loading changes might be qualitatively seen from the driver throttle request. If the driver requests throttle and the vehicle does not provide enough acceleration, the driver would increase throttle request level consistently. By checking how many times the driver is initiating excessive throttle and the information from accelerator/throttle signal generator 43A, the qualitative determination of load change would indicate that the vehicle might have significant loading changes. Such a sensor may be coupled directly to the accelerator pedal or may be coupled to the throttle. Typical throttle sensors include a resistive sensor through which the amount of throttle opening and closing may be observed.

The vehicle loading changes might be qualitatively determined from the driver braking request. If the driver requests certain driver braking pressure and the vehicle does not provide enough deceleration, the driver would increase braking pressure request level consistently. By checking how many times the driver is initiating spike or excessive braking and the brake pedal/brake signal generator 43B, the qualitative determination of load change would indicate that the vehicle might have significant loading changes. A brake pedal/brake signal generator may be coupled directly to the brake pedal to determine the driver braking trends. By applying more or less braking the loading increase or reduction may be determined.

In step 202, when a potential for a load change is determined from the qualitative determination logic set forth in step 200, the least square sum variables used in the conditional least square algorithm are reset to zero in step 204. That is, the roll condition may be reset to a default value so that new least square running averages and sums may be started. In step 206, a new or revised roll condition parameter may be determined based on the newly calculated variables involving least square running averages and sums.

Referring back to step 202, when the qualitative determination logic determines that a potential load change has not happened, then another adaptive roll condition may be determined in step 208. That is, based on the current dynamic sensors, another adaptive roll condition may be determined. In step 210 this new adaptive roll condition may be averaged with the previously determined adaptive roll condition. After steps 206 and 210, the system returns to step 200 in which a potential load change condition is determined.

While particular embodiments of the invention have been shown and described, numerous variations and alternate embodiments will occur to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, it is intended that the invention be limited only in terms of the appended claims. 

1. A method of controlling a safety system for a vehicle comprising the steps of: determining a roll rate signal indicative of a roll rate of said vehicle; operating a load change detector to indirectly determine a potential load change onboard said vehicle according to signals received from at least one device selected from the group consisting of a door sensor, a tailgate sensor, a longitudinal acceleration sensor, a transmission sensor, a transmission controller, an accelerator pedal sensor, a throttle position sensor, a throttle signal generator, a brake pedal sensor, and a brake signal generator; determining a change in loading mass onboard said vehicle from said roll rate signal and said potential load change; and adaptively controlling the safety system in response to the change in loading mass.
 2. A method as recited in claim 1 further comprising determining a lateral acceleration and wherein determining a change in loading mass comprises determining the change in loading mass in response to the roll rate signal and the lateral acceleration.
 3. A method as recited in claim 1 further comprising determining a lateral acceleration, a longitudinal acceleration and a yaw rate and wherein determining a change in loading mass comprises determining a change in loading mass in response to the roll rate signal and the lateral acceleration, a longitudinal acceleration and a yaw rate.
 4. A method as recited in claim 1 further comprising determining a change in height of the change in loading mass and wherein adaptively controlling the safety system further comprises adaptively controlling the safety system in response to the change in loading mass and the change in height of the change in loading mass.
 5. A method as recited in claim 4 further comprising determining a lateral acceleration and wherein determining a change in height of the change in loading mass and the change in mass further comprises determining the change in height and the change in mass in response to the roll rate signal and the lateral acceleration.
 6. A method as recited in claim 4 further comprising determining a lateral acceleration, a longitudinal acceleration and a yaw rate and wherein determining a change in height of the change in mass comprises determining a change in height of said change in mass in response to the roll rate signal and the lateral acceleration, a longitudinal acceleration and a yaw rate.
 7. A method as recited in claim 4 wherein adaptively controlling the safety system comprises adaptively adjusting a roll angle determination in response to the change in mass and the change in height of the change in mass.
 8. A method as recited in claim 4 wherein adaptively controlling the safety system comprises adjusting control gains in response to the change in mass and change in height of the change in mass.
 9. A method as recited in claim 4 wherein the change in height of the change in mass comprises a revised height of the center of gravity of the vehicle including the change in mass.
 10. A method as recited in claim 6 further comprising determining a revised roll inertia of the change in mass and wherein adaptively controlling the safety system comprises adaptively controlling the safety system in response to the roll inertia of the change in mass.
 11. A method as recited in claim 6 further comprising determining a revised roll inertia of the vehicle and the change in mass and wherein adaptively controlling the safety system comprises adaptively controlling the safety system in response to the revised roll inertia of the vehicle and the change in mass.
 12. A method as recited in claim 6 wherein adaptively controlling the safety system comprises adaptively controlling a roll stability control system.
 13. A method as recited in claim 6 wherein adaptively controlling the safety system comprises adaptively adjusting a roll angle determination in response to the change in mass.
 14. A method as recited in claim 6 wherein adaptively controlling the safety system comprises adjusting control gains in response to the change in mass.
 15. A method as recited in claim 6 wherein adaptively controlling the safety system comprises adaptively controlling an active suspension system.
 16. A method as recited in claim 6 wherein adaptively controlling the safety system comprises adaptively controlling a semi-active suspension system.
 17. A method as recited in claim 6 wherein adaptively controlling the safety system comprises adaptively controlling an anti-roll bar system.
 18. A method as recited in claim 6 wherein adaptively controlling the safety system comprises adaptively controlling an airbag system.
 19. A method as recited in claim 6 wherein adaptively controlling the safety system comprises adaptively controlling anti-lock brake system.
 20. A method as recited in claim 6 wherein adaptively controlling the safety system comprises adaptively controlling a stability control system.
 21. A method as recited in claim 6 wherein adaptively controlling the safety system comprises adaptively controlling a yaw stability control system.
 22. A method as recited in claim 6 wherein adaptively controlling the safety system comprises adaptively controlling a traction control system. 